CALL US TODAY
(416) 864 - 6200

Tax & Trade Blog

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Archives
    Archives Contains a list of blog posts that were created previously.

Posted by on in Tax Law

Tax Law - Tax & Trade Blog

International Trade Report

FUEL VENDOR REGISTRATIONS IN CANADA

OVERVIEW OF FUEL TAXES & REQUIRED REGISTRATIONS


Canada’s fuel tax and registration landscape involves a patchwork of federal and provincial laws. Depending on the nature of their activities, both resident and non-resident oil and gas companies operating in Canada face many layers of compliance obligations.

This blog provides a high-level overview of the kinds of registrations or licenses that may be required for those selling or distributing fuel in Canada.

Last modified on
Hits: 35
0

Tax Law - Tax & Trade Blog

International Trade Report

CRA AUDITS PURPOSE-BUILT HOUSING REBATE

CRA REBATE ADMINISTRATION LEADS TO MANY DENIALS


When Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government announced its new 100% GST rebate for tax paid on the construction of qualifying new rental housing in September 2023 (which we blogged on here), the measure – formally called the Enhanced GST New Rental Housing Rebate – was unveiled with considerable fanfare.  In fact, it was touted as a key pillar of Canada’s renewed national housing strategy, and designed to reduce development costs, accelerate construction of much-needed rental units and increase long-term affordability for renters across Canada.

That fanfare has now met the practical reality of tax auditors at CRA charged with reviewing and auditing these Rebate Applications.   In fact, CRA is now actively auditing in this area and rejecting a number of Rebate Applications for failing to meet the very complicated rules that came with the new Rebate process.

Last modified on
Hits: 100
0

Tax Law - Tax & Trade Blog

International Trade Report

CRA DIRECTS TAXPAYER TO WRONG COURT!

PROPER JURISDICTION REQUIRED AT OUTSET OF ALL TAX DISPUTES


The question of jurisdiction (that is, which Court has the authority to hear a particular dispute) remains often confused in the administration of Canadian tax law.  While the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) routinely provides directions in its decision letters about where taxpayers can appeal, a recent Tax Court of Canada (“TCC”) decision demonstrates that the CRA sometimes gets this wrong – with serious consequences for taxpayers!

More problematically, a similar scenario may now be unfolding with the Canada Border Services Agency’s (“CBSA”) appeal process for remission applications made in respect of Canada’s recent retaliatory tariffs imposed on US goods.

Last modified on
Hits: 255
0

Tax Law - Tax & Trade Blog

International Trade Report

NEW BUDGET TWEAKS INDIRECT TAX RULES

BUDGET 2025 HARD TO CELEBRATE BUT PROPOSES SOME GOOD INDIRECT TAX CHANGES


Canada's Budget 2025 was launched on November 4th with the energy of a lead balloon. Despite the doom and gloom focus on the continuing deficit financing by the Liberal Government – off-loading our current woes on the backs of our children and grandchildren – there were some (largely) positive changes from an Indirect Tax perspective.

The highlights, in our view, are as follows.

Last modified on
Hits: 659
0

Tax Law - Tax & Trade Blog

International Trade Report

NEW HOUSING REBATE FOR BUILDERS

TCC LOWERS THE BAR FOR "OCCUPATION AS A PLACE OF RESIDENCE"


As we have blogged here and here, homeowners who sell their newly built homes shortly after taking possession have long been a target of CRA audits.  When these homeowners also claim the GST/HST New Housing Rebate, the CRA reviews their claims closely.

A key issue in these New Housing Rebate claims is whether the homebuyers occupied the property as a place of residence after completion of construction.  In the past, courts have applied a stringent standard in interpreting what constitutes “occupation as a place of residence”.

In a recent decision, Sharma v. The King (2025 TCC 145), the Tax Court of Canada (“TCC”) lowered the bar for establishing “occupation as a place of residence”, signalling an attenuated interpretation that favours taxpayers.

Last modified on
Hits: 368
0

Toronto Office

10 Lower Spadina Avenue, Suite 200, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2Z2 Canada
Phone: (416) 864-6200| Fax: (416) 864-6201

Client Login

To access the Millar Kreklewetz LLP secure client file transfer system, please log in.