CALL US TODAY
(416) 864 - 6200
  • Home
  • Recent blog posts

Tax & Trade Blog

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Archives
    Archives Contains a list of blog posts that were created previously.
Recent blog posts

Posted by on in Customs & Trade Blog

The 30-day moratorium on Trump’s and Canadian retaliatory tariffs should give Canadian importers and exporters some breathing room.  But that breathing room ought to be put to good use considering current duty minimization opportunities, with the future possible implementation of these tariffs in mind.  “Unbundling” is one technique for dealing with punitive tariffs and is reviewed here.

What is Unbundling?

While we are generalizing here, unbundling involves lawfully stripping away non-dutiable components from otherwise dutiable goods.  When goods are imported into a country, the value of those goods needs to be determined so that the proper amount of duty can be applied.  Both Canada and the United States (“US”) are parties to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (the “GATT”) and employ a version of the GATT Valuation Code.  Under that code, the “transaction value” method is the primary system, and focusses on the “price paid or payable” for the imported goods, plus certain additions and less certain deductions.

Last modified on
Hits: 105
0

On January 13, 2025, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the “CITT”) announced its Finding in Inquiry NQ-2024-003 (the “Finding”) reporting that the dumping of certain hot-rolled deformed steel concrete reinforcing bar in straight lengths or coils, commonly known as rebar, originating in or exported from the Republic of Bulgaria (Bulgaria), the Kingdom of Thailand (Thailand), and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) (the “Subject Goods”) had caused injury to the domestic industry.

New Anti-Dumping Duties (“ADDs”) now apply to certain Subject Goods imported into Canada and released after January 13, 2025.

Last modified on
Hits: 106
0

In a previous blog post, we discussed the high tax rates on Wine, Beer & Spirits products and the complex legal framework surrounding them.  In this 101 series, we will cover key topics, including Licensing Requirements, Audits and Assessments, and Enforcement Actions.  This first installment focuses on the Licensing Requirements for producers of Wine, Beer & Spirits products.  Licensing is often seen as the first step in compliance, and failure to meet these requirements can result in severe penalties, including fines, imprisonment, or both.

Wine Licence

Under subsection 62(1) of the Excise Act, 2001 (the “EA 2001”), a person is prohibited from producing or packaging wine without a Wine Licence, except in certain cases such as producing for personal use.  To obtain a licence, applicants must meet specific eligibility criteria, which vary depending on whether they are individuals, partnerships, or corporations.  A common requirement is that the applicant has to demonstrate sufficient financial resources to operate business in a responsible manner.

Last modified on
Hits: 175
0

A couple of recent cases in the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”), which saw the taxpayer and importer, respectively, attempting to appeal earlier Court decisions, have emphasized that tax and trade litigation is a “one-shot deal”, where taxpayers (and importers on the trade side) are required to put their best foot forward in the lower Courts, and will be unlikely to get a second chance at making arguments before the FCA (or the lower Courts) if they do not do so.

Doostyar v. Canada

Doostyar v. Canada was a tax case, appealed to the FCA, in which the taxpayer’s position was that the Tax Court of Canada (“TCC”) erred by not accepting its additional submissions, post hearing.

Last modified on
Hits: 109
0

As we have previously written here and here, a taxpayer’s debts can be imposed on their spouse or children through an assessment under section 160 of the Income Tax Act (“ITA”).  The Federal Court of Appeal has now drawn a line in the sand limiting the reach of such assessments with respect to the spouse of a tax debtor.

In Enns v. The King, 2025 FCA 14, the Court held that a survivor ceases to be the spouse of a deceased taxpayer for the purposes of section 160 of the ITA.  While the ruling is a win for survivors, it leaves open the question of how far the CRA’s assessment powers under section 160 may extend.

Last modified on
Hits: 143
0

As we blogged on here, the threatened Trump and Canadian retaliatory tariffs stand to have a serious impact on Canadian businesses.  Beyond the anticipatory steps we described previously that can be taken now, businesses should begin seriously considering their options for avoiding or recovering any retaliatory tariffs.

In this Report, we will review some of those options.

Tariff Exemptions

In compelling circumstances, it may be possible for a business to obtain an exemption from the retaliatory tariffs.  Exemptions may be available for businesses that can demonstrate they will be unduly harmed by the tariffs.  For example, if it can be established there are no viable alternatives in the supply chain for inputs required for goods that a business produces, an exemption may be made. 

Last modified on
Hits: 172
0

One of the more difficult things I have run into in my 35+ years of practice in customs, trade, and indirect tax, is navigating through extremely difficult to understand appeals processes, buried in multiple similar and parallel sections in the Customs Act (“Act”).

A recent case makes me think that I am not alone in this world (!), with the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (“CITT”) chastising the Canada Border Service Agency (“CBSA”) for misunderstanding and potentially misapplying the customs appeal processes.

Last modified on
Hits: 144
0

The Canada Border Services Agency (“CBSA”) resets its “audit priority areas” twice per year.  Essentially, the CBSA designates certain tariff classification codes as priority areas for customs verifications (i.e., “audits”), based on the program areas which the CBSA believes pose significant risk for important non-compliance in tariff classification, valuation, and origin of goods.

The CBSA has released its January 2025 Trade Compliance Verification priorities, setting the stage for the next six (6) months.    As is often the case, most of the focus is on tariff classification.

Last modified on
Hits: 179
0

While Canada was given a short reprieve yesterday from the tariffs threatened by US President, Donald J. Trump, President Trump appears to have doubled-down signalling that these 25% tariffs will be coming by February 1.  If this is to be believed, the days of US and Canadian weighted average tariffs in the 2.2-3.4% range are over, and Canadian businesses need to begin preparing for the challenges these sorts of significant tariffs will bring – including the likelihood of Canadian retaliatory measures, which we reported on here

In this Report will review basic preparation steps for “right now”.

Last modified on
Hits: 159
0

The trade relationship between the United States (“US”) and Canada is facing renewed tensions as President Trump has reaffirmed that the US will impose a blanket 25 percent tariff on all Canadian goods, and is aiming to do this as soon as February 1, 2025.

In response, Canadian government officials have signaled Canada will respond with retaliatory tariffs and other possible countermeasures such as export taxes.  Consequently, it is important to understand how retaliatory import tariffs and export taxes have worked in the past, and how they might work in the future.

Last modified on
Hits: 302
0

As we blogged on here, CRA has recently taken steps to reverse what was generally understood to have been their historical position on employer eligible ITCs in pension plan situations involving insurance segregated fund products.

In a recent Excise News Publication, CRA doubles-down on this position in a very public way, seemingly setting the stage for audits in this area to come.

Last modified on
Hits: 201
0

The new year brings possible new tax reporting requirements for direct sales platform operators (“Direct Sellers”)!

These changes stem from amendments to the Income Tax Act (“ITA”) and mandate that digital platform operators throughout the online “gig” economy report income and certain other information about some of the sellers using their websites or apps to the Canada Revenue Agency (the “CRA”).  See our prior article for more technical information.

Those affected include certain Direct Sellers operating on a “buy-resale” model.  Filings for the 2024 year are due by January 31, 2025!

Which Direct Sellers Are Affected?

Last modified on
Hits: 306
0

As we questioned the tax and health policies of Canada’s regulations on vaping products here, we note the Department of Finance’s position on non-alcoholic beer, which has been duty-free from an excise tax perspective since July 2022.  This is an example of good tax policy, focussing on promoting the adoption of safer, healthier alternatives by reducing the tax burden on substitutable products.  It contrasts to the current approach to vaping products, which involves taxing them at high rates, almost comparable to those applied to smoking products.

Excise Duty on Alcoholic Beer

In Canada, excise duty is imposed under the Excise Act on all beer produced for commercial purposes, with rates dictated by alcohol strength, production volume, and whether the beer is brewed domestically or imported.

Last modified on
Hits: 168
0

Beginning this year, digital platform operators should be aware of the new tax reporting requirements under section 292 of the Income Tax Act (“ITA”).  Many reportable digital platforms (including many online “gig” platforms) will now be required to file reports with the CRA providing information about the activities of their “reportable sellers”.  Filings for the 2024 year are due by January 31, 2025!

Which Platform Operators are Affected?

The new requirements target a subset of “platform operators”, which under section 282 of the ITA include websites or applications that contract with sellers to use all or part of a platform to connect with customers. 

Last modified on
Hits: 216
0

Since 1997, the Customs Act has imposed both mandatory payment and correction obligations on importers subject to Assessments.  In fact, if an importer wishes to challenge the Assessment, the only option is to first pay the assessed amount, and then request a review of the assessment – a system often referred to as “pay-to-play”.

As highlighted in the recent case of Skechers USA Canada, Inc. v. Canada Border Services Agency (2025 FCA 1) (“Skechers”), these obligations leave importers with limited options.  This means putting your best foot forward in a customs Compliance Verification is often the only practical way of dealing with a CBSA Assessment – often with the assistance of specialized legal advice.

Last modified on
Hits: 213
0

Many travelers, including seasoned and sophisticated travelers, misunderstand the fundamental obligation to declare all goods being imported into Canada.

The most common misconception is often that “I’m within my exemption limits” and therefore “I don’t have to tell anybody what I’m bringing in”.

A recent case from the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) demonstrates that this is far from the truth!

Last modified on
Hits: 181
0

Staffing agencies (as well as Employment Agencies, Temporary Labour, Placement Agencies and other similar entities – “Agencies”) play a growing role in connecting businesses with Canadian workers, but these models can come with unexpected tax “strings attached”.

For example, did you know that in some cases, Agencies hiring workers classified as independent contractors can still be required to make Canada Pension Plan (“CPP”) and Employment Insurance (“EI”) contributions (as if the workers were their employees)?  This tax quirk can be difficult to understand, especially when the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) views one’s workers to be non-employees!

Last modified on
Hits: 214
0

In 2024, the Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act (the “FALC”) came into force, which imposed annual reporting obligations for certain entities.  While the 2024 reports were due last year, this is a recurring obligation with significant penalties for non-compliance.

Recently, the Canadian government issued its Report to Parliament summarizing the submissions received for the 2024 reporting cycle.  This Report serves as a reminder of the ongoing importance of timely compliance with the reporting obligations, with the next reporting deadline on May 31, 2025.

Last modified on
Hits: 188
0

On January 1, 2025, Canada is set to make changes to its to unilateral tariff programs for imports under the Customs Tariff.  The changes include several beneficiary countries being graduated from the General Preferential Tariff (“GPT”) and Least Developed Country Tariff (“LDCT”) programs, and the introduction of a General Preferential Tariff Plus Program (“GPTP”) that will come into force at a later date.

Background

Canada’s customs system operates on the basis of preferential tariffs, in which countries are assigned a particular tariff treatment.  The tariff treatment assigned to a country is used (in conjunction with the HS Code) to determine the rate of duty imposed on a particular good imported into Canada from that country.

Last modified on
Hits: 373
0

After COVID, the CRA seems to be really ramping up its audit activities, both for GST/HST and income tax matters.  Once a Notice of Assessment is issued, reversing the CRA’s position becomes an uphill battle as the Objection and Appeal processes are technical and complex.

This blog focuses on the Objection and Appeal processes under the Excise Tax Act (the “ETA”), highlighting common pitfalls and the need for a strategic approach in tax disputes.

Last modified on
Hits: 228
0

Toronto Office

10 Lower Spadina Avenue, Suite 200, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2Z2 Canada
Phone: (416) 864-6200| Fax: (416) 864-6201

Client Login

To access the Millar Kreklewetz LLP secure client file transfer system, please log in.